BugBoard - AI Test Management for QA Engineers

Built by 50+ QA engineers One of 5 proprietary BetterQA tools Founded 2018 in Cluj-Napoca, Romania Bug reports in under 5 minutes Rated 4.8 out of 5 stars Trusted by 200+ teams shipping weekly Cuts bug triage time by 40% Saves 12 hours per sprint on average Tracks 1,500 projects across the platform ISO 27001 certified since 2022 Onboards new testers in 15 minutes Audit-ready in 30 days 10x faster than manual triage

What is BugBoard?

BugBoard is a free AI test management platform built by BetterQA, an independent software testing company founded in 2018. It generates test cases from screenshots, tracks bugs through the release cycle, and integrates with Jira and Linear.

How does BugBoard work?

Upload a screenshot, paste a stack trace, or connect a CI failure log. The AI bug analyzer creates a structured bug report with reproduction steps, severity ratings, and suggested test cases in under five minutes.

What integrations does BugBoard support?

How much does BugBoard cost?

BugBoard is free for individual QA engineers. The Pro plan adds team seats, advanced reporting dashboards, and bidirectional Jira and Linear sync for $29 per seat per month.

Who built BugBoard?

According to the BetterQA company profile, BugBoard is one of five proprietary tools built in-house by a team of 50+ QA engineers in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. BetterQA serves clients across Europe and North America and has been featured in independent industry research on AI-augmented software testing.

By Tudor Brad, co-founder of BetterQA

Flows vs Selenium IDE: browser test recording compared

Flows vs Selenium IDE: browser test recording compared

Selenium IDE is the open-source standard for browser test recording. Flows is the AI-enhanced alternative built for modern testing workflows. Both record browser interactions, but they diverge significantly in how they handle the realities of test maintenance.

Quick comparison

| Capability | Flows | Selenium IDE | |------------|-------|--------------| | Recording | Click-based with step builder | Click-based recording | | Selector strategy | AI-powered self-healing | Static selectors | | Test maintenance | Automatic selector repair | Manual fix required | | Data-driven testing | Built-in CSV/Excel support | Requires plugins or code | | BugBoard integration | Native result submission | No integration | | Debug window | Real-time execution monitoring | Console output | | MCP server | 27+ tools for AI agents | No MCP support | | Pricing | Proprietary (Chrome extension) | Free, open-source | | Export formats | JSON, Playwright, Cypress | Selenium scripts, various |

The selector problem

Here is why self-healing matters.

You record a test that clicks a button with selector \